This is the whole report.
Here's how to read it.

Nothing in this listing can be verified. Adjectives like "revolutionary", "best-in-class", "powerful" +7 more describe every competitor equally, so they carry no information. Replace each one with the number behind it, the certification that proves it, or the system it integrates with. This is the single highest-leverage change on the page.

The proof that is here is thin against the length of the copy — a buyer reads several paragraphs before hitting anything concrete. Aim for roughly one verifiable fact every two or three sentences.

The first thing a buyer reads is adjectives, not what the product is. Superlatives are the fastest way to read as undifferentiated — every competitor uses the same ones. Say what it does in the first sentence and let the numbers carry the persuasion.

Nothing in the copy says "X is a Y for Z" outright. Human buyers skim for it and AI assistants extract it verbatim when they summarise you in a shortlist — if it is not there, both have to guess.

The copy never says who this is for. "Modern teams" is not an audience. Name the role, team, or industry — a buyer self-qualifies in seconds, and an AI assistant needs it to decide whether to surface you for a given query.

A buyer is asking "does this fit my stack?" and the copy does not answer it. Name the actual services — AWS Lambda, EKS, Snowflake, Okta — not "your existing tools". Named integrations are also one of the few claims a buying agent can verify on its own.

SaaS or AMI? Agent or agentless? In their VPC or yours? A buyer cannot get budget for something they cannot describe to their architect, and this is the first question procurement asks.

Highlights are the most-read part of a listing and these are adjectives. Each one should carry a number, a named system, or a concrete capability — "Cut p99 latency by 40%" instead of "Best-in-class performance".

The title has no term anyone would actually search. Buyers filter by category and AI assistants match on it — a brand name alone is invisible to both. Lead with what it is ("API Gateway", "Data Warehouse"), then differentiate.

When an assistant builds a shortlist it lifts individual sentences out of context. Sentences that need the paragraph around them to mean anything get dropped. Most of this copy is that kind of sentence — rewrite so each one stands alone with a fact in it.

The description is an unbroken block. Buyers skim and parsers segment on structure — bullets and short sections make both work.

Nothing here tells a buyer their security review will pass. Name the certifications you hold (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA) and the posture behind them (encryption, SSO, audit logging). Security review is where marketplace deals die, and this is the field that survives it.

"Email support is available" is not a commitment — it is a sentence. State the channels, the coverage window, and a response time a buyer could hold you to. A number here is worth more than a paragraph of reassurance.

There is no price on the page. Buyers who cannot price you compare you against vendors they can, and an AI assistant building a shortlist will simply omit you — it has nothing to put in the price column. Even a starting rate or a unit ("$0.10 per 1,000 requests") is enough.

Every route into this product goes through a person. A free tier, a trial, or a pay-as-you-go subscription lets a buyer evaluate you on a Friday afternoon — which is when most marketplace evaluation actually happens.

The copy routes the buyer to a demo or a quote instead of a price. That is a dead end for a self-serve buyer and a hard stop for a buying agent — it cannot book a meeting. Keep the demo offer, but put a price beside it.